Wicker leads Hempfield East Legion team to district title game | TribLIVE.com
Other Local

Wicker leads Hempfield East Legion team to district title game

Paul Schofield
1410378_web1_web-Baseballstock2

Matt Wicker hasn’t been asked to pitch much for the Hempfield East American Legion team this summer.

Coach Scott Smith was saving him after he threw a lot of innings during the high school season.

Wicker, a Greensburg Salem grad and the Golden Lions’ ace this past spring, answered the call on the mound and at the plate Saturday in the District 31 semifinals at Latrobe.

Wicker banged out four hits including a double and held Latrobe scoreless over the final 41/3 innings as Hempfield East rallied for a 10-4 victory to sweep the series 2-0 against the Jethawks and clinch a spot in the championship game and a berth in the Region 7 tournament.

Hempfield East (19-2-1) will face rival Bushy Run at 5 p.m. Tuesday for the title. Bushy Run defeated Unity, 9-0, to sweep its series.

Latrobe’s season isn’t over. The Jethawks, by being the host team, will join the two finalists in the Region 7 tournament that begins Friday.

Latrobe chased Hempfield East starter Shane Stuchell in the third inning after scoring on a hit by Vinnie Amatucci and on a two-run single by Jake Bradish. Wicker got a strikeout to end the threat as Latrobe left runners on second and third.

Hempfield East tied the score in the top of the fourth inning on a balk and took the lead on Reed Hipps’ single.

East tacked on two more runs in the fifth inning and three in the sixth.

Hipps (three RBIs) and John Malinak each had three hits for East. Amatucci had three hits for Latrobe.

Paul Schofield is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.