Will Sean Davis’ return help Steelers’ issues with miscommunication, allowing big plays? | TribLIVE.com

Will Sean Davis’ return help Steelers’ issues with miscommunication, allowing big plays?

Chris Adamski
Steelers safety Sean Davis back in gear during practice Aug. 7 at Saint Vincent. After missing the season opener because of injury, Davis will return for Sunday’s game and the Steelers are hopeful that will make a difference with their secondary.

The season opener was, in the head coach’s words, a “catastrophic” loss in which the Pittsburgh Steelers were “failing miserably.”

While no particular unit of the team should be spared of blame, the secondary perhaps took the hardest hit. The New England Patriots connected on seven passing plays of at least 20 yards, including all three of their touchdowns.

Can the return of one man fix all of that?

“I would like to think so,” veteran linebacker Mark Barron said of free safety Sean Davis, who will play Sunday against he Seattle Seahawks after missing the opener. “He has that experience and his communication and him knowing things and being a guy who’s played in this scheme for an amount of years, I would like to think that it does.”

Davis is unheralded as a free safety in some ways, particularly if measured by his apparent effect on limiting opposition big plays. After only two teams in the league allowed more 40-plus-yard passing plays then the 2017 Steelers, Davis was moved to free safety in 2018.

That season, only six teams allowed fewer passing plays of at least 40 yards.

So, perhaps that no team allowed more passing plays of 20 yards or more in Week 1 is not a coincidence that it was not Davis but a player making his NFL regular-season debut in Kameron Kelly at free safety.

“I am glad that he’s back out there,” Haden said of Davis. “He knows the defense very well, he’s always comfortable, so just hearing his voice back there kind of helps because he knows what he’s talking about.”

Davis had appeared in each of the Steelers’ first 47 games since he was drafted, but he has missed the past two (he sat out last year’s finale because of a quadriceps injury).

“This is my fourth year now, and I am not going to play hurt no more,” David said. “The guys on the other side of the ball are just too good if you can’t keep up with them. You kind of have to put your pride aside and just be a smarter football player, so I have learned that. But I’m good to go this week.”

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.