With 8 medals at worlds, swimmer Caeleb Dressel establishes own standard | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World Sports

With 8 medals at worlds, swimmer Caeleb Dressel establishes own standard

Associated Press
Gold medalist Caeleb Dressel of the U.S. (right) stands with silver medalists Bruno Fratus of Brazil (left) and Kristian Gklolomeev of Greece after the men’s 50 freestyle final at the World Swimming Championships in Gwangju, South Korea.

GWANGJU, South Korea — Exhaustion and relief flooded Caeleb Dressel. Maybe now the comparisons with Michael Phelps can fade away.

Dressel earned eight medals, including six golds, at the world swimming championships, the biggest meet outside the Olympics. Two years ago in Hungary, he tied Phelps’ record of seven golds at a single worlds, including three in one night.

Dressel set his own standard in Gwangju, where he again won three golds in a single night.

“There’s parts during the meet where it’s not the greatest feeling: the stress that you feel, the pressure I put on myself,” he said, adding, “I do enjoy it, the challenge that it brings.”

Top Sports Videos

On Sunday, Dressel capped his eight-day run with silver in the 400-meter medley relay. He hauled the U.S. from fourth to first on his butterfly leg with a split of 49.28 seconds — the only sub-50 second fly leg in the field.

Had anchor Nathan Adrian not been overtaken by Britain’s Duncan Scott in the closing meters, Dressel would have won a seventh gold. Adrian and relay teammates Ryan Murphy and Andrew Wilson were upset they didn’t deliver.

“I was the first guy in the water, and I would say I had a pretty embarrassing performance,” Murphy said. “It kind of put us in a hole from the beginning.”

Wilson added, “All of us are just finding places where it’s on us. We just all need to be better, and we will be next year. It’s frustrating now but it’s fuel for the next year.”

Heading into its first Olympics in the post-Phelps era, the U.S. appears in good shape for Tokyo.

After a slow start in Gwangju, the Americans finished with 27 medals in the pool, including a leading 14 golds. They won the team title, and Dressel earned male swimmer of the meet honors. The U.S. set five world records, including two by 17-year-old backstroker Regan Smith.

Australia was second with 19 and five golds.

Dressel’s golds came in the 50 and 100 free, 50 and 100 butterfly, mixed 400 free relay and 400 free relay. His other silver was in the mixed 400 medley relay.

Dressel took down Phelps’ world record in the 100 fly, going 49.50 in the semifinals.

He came close in Hungary but didn’t get it done.

“Two years ago, I was a little scared, I’ll admit, coming that close,” Dressel said. “It can be a scary thought to do something that’s never been done before.”

The difference in Gwangju was Dressel woke up the day of the race and wanted to go after the mark.

“I hope he was happy watching me,” he said.

Dressel still feels his retired teammate’s influence. He knows the 23-time Olympic gold medalist’s times and watched how Phelps swam his races.

“It’s really special for me just to have that one little moment where I claimed I was the best in the history of swimming,” Dressel said. “Just a young kid from a small town, it’s just crazy how far the sport can go.”

Like Phelps, Dressel is his own worst critic. The 22-year-old Floridian picks apart each of his races, whether the result is gold, a world record or something less lofty.

“I always look for the bad,” he said. “There’s plenty to improve on. I know what to look for heading into next year, even for small meets. I take each event and I have to learn from it.”

Categories: Sports | US-World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.