ShareThis Page
With Antonio Brown headed out, Steelers’ JuJu Smith-Schuster tweets he’s ready | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

With Antonio Brown headed out, Steelers’ JuJu Smith-Schuster tweets he’s ready

Frank Carnevale
862410_web1_AP_18343829151743
AP
Pittsburgh Steelers wide receiver JuJu Smith-Schuster (19) waits to catch a touchdown pass against the Oakland Raiders during the first half of an NFL football game in Oakland, Calif., Sunday, Dec. 9, 2018. (AP Photo/Ben Margot)

Are you ready for a Pittsburgh Steelers team without Antonio Brown?

Apparently No.2-in-line-to-be-No.1 wide receiver JuJu Smith-Schuster is.

On Sunday, just hours after news broke that Brown is headed to the Oakland Raiders in a trade for draft picks with the Steelers, the exuberant Smith-Schuster tweeted, “I’m Ready” with a photo of him catching a touchdown pass with Brown in the background.

The photo appears to be from the Steelers game against the Raiders on Dec. 9, 2018. It was one of Smith-Schuster’s best games with 2 touchdown catches, but the Steelers lost 24-21.

So next season’s changing of the guard will likely feature Smith-Schuster stepping up to be quarterback Ben Roethlisberger’s top target.

In 2018 Smith-Schuster was statistically the team’s top wide receiver with 111 receptions for 1,426 yards and seven receiving touchdowns.


But many say that his resume was bolstered by playing alongside Brown, who often drew more attention from opposing defenses. Smith-Schuster, a second-round pick in 2017, was also named the teams’ MVP last season all the players.

Throughout the off-season, Smith-Schuster has maintained that he wanted Brown to stay with the team.

Frank Carnevale is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Frank via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.