With Donte Moncrief struggling, Mike Tomlin could make WR changes | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

With Donte Moncrief struggling, Mike Tomlin could make WR changes

Joe Rutter
1687656_web1_1649256-1a90ea2c9e314d079e7f439e2be2c10b
AP
New England Patriots strong safety Patrick Chung (23) celebrates with teammates after breaking up a pass intended for Pittsburgh Steelers wide receiver Donte Moncrief, left, in the first half an NFL football game, Sunday, Sept. 8, 2019, in Foxborough, Mass.

Through two games, wide receiver Donte Moncrief has more drops (five) than he does receptions (three). In fact, his drops are two fewer than his total receiving yards (seven).

Not quite the production the Pittsburgh Steelers were expecting when they signed Moncrief to a two-year, $9 million contract in free agency.

“I don’t know what to make of it,” coach Mike Tomlin said Tuesday. “I know we haven’t been able to depend on him to this point. He’s got some challenges and we have some challenges moving forward.”

Moncrief played 18 snaps in the Steelers’ 28-26 loss Sunday to Seattle. He didn’t see the field after his drop led to an interception on the Steelers’ first series of the second half. It was his only target of the game.

Moncrief dropped four passes in the opener at New England.

Asked whether Moncrief will get a chance to work through his challenges Sunday at San Francisco, Tomlin said, “We’ll see.”

Tomlin did say there will be a change in the distribution of snaps for the team’s wide receivers. Rookie Diontae Johnson, who played 27 snaps against Seattle, could be a recipient of any playing time that Moncrief loses. James Washington would become the starter opposite JuJu Smith-Schuster. He played 60 percent of the snaps against Seattle.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.