ShareThis Page
W&J wins, La Roche loses on 1st day of NCAA D-III baseball regionals; Mercyhurst wins in D-II | TribLIVE.com
District College

W&J wins, La Roche loses on 1st day of NCAA D-III baseball regionals; Mercyhurst wins in D-II

1174781_web1_Mountain_Jeff2
W&J Athletics
Washington & Jefferson baseball coach Jeff Mountain led his team to the PAC title this season, and the Presidents won their NCAA regional opener Friday.

A pair of two-RBI hits and strong pitching propelled the Washington & Jefferson baseball team to a 4-1 victory over host Salisbury in the opening game of an NCAA Division III regional in Maryland.

Mullen Socha hit a two-run single in the third to give the Presidents a 2-0 lead. In the eighth, after Salisbury had cut the lead to 2-1 the previous inning, James Artale launched a two-run homer to put W&J up 4-1. It was Artale’s sixth homer of the season.

That was enough to back starter Ben Marsico (7 innings) and relievers Mitchell Taufer and Clay Martin, who threw a scoreless inning each. For Martin, it was his eighth save

W&J, the Presidents’ Athletic Conference champion, faces Rowan on Saturday.

La Roche, meanwhile, dropped a 4-0 decision to Denison in its regional opener in Adrian, Mich. Denison got all four of its runs across the fourth and fifth innings to spoil an otherwise-solid effort from Redhawks starter Tristin Tinney.

The Redhawks, the Allegheny Mountain Collegiate Conference champion, will play a losers’ bracket game Saturday.

In the Division II Atlantic Regional, Mercyhurst got seven shutout innings from Matthew Minnick and two scoreless relief innings from Jared Kapturasky to win its opener, 2-0 over Millersville. Domenic DeRenzo drove in one run and scored the other.

The Lakers face Bloomsburg Saturday.

Categories: Sports | College-District
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.