WVU hopes to finish with victory, end TCU’s bowl hopes | TribLIVE.com

WVU hopes to finish with victory, end TCU’s bowl hopes

Associated Press
West Virginia quarterback Jarrett Doege will start his third consecutive game Friday against TCU.

FORT WORTH, Texas — West Virginia will not make it to a bowl this season, so the Mountaineers will try to spoil TCU’s postseason hopes.

Garret Wallow and TCU are in the same position as last season, having to win their last regular-season game just to get bowl eligible.

“It’s definitely like last year’s situation. Definitely very intense,” said Wallow, the junior linebacker and Big 12 leading tackler. “It’s on the line, so all of us want to make it to a bowl game. All of us want to give the seniors the best season they can have.”

While the current seniors made it to the Big 12 championship game in 2017, this could be the third time in four years TCU finishes the regular season with six wins — just enough to get to a bowl

The Horned Frogs (5-6, 3-5 Big 12) have to win Friday at home against West Virginia (4-7, 2-6) or miss a bowl for only the third time in coach Gary Patterson’s 19 seasons. They had to win their final two games last year and did that before beating California in the Cheez-It Bowl.

West Virginia’s bowl hopes under first-year coach Neal Brown, the former Texas Tech offensive coordinator, ended last week in a 20-13 home loss to No. 21 Oklahoma State.

“I believe our guys will show up and play hard. … I think it’s about two things from a motivational factor: sending the seniors out on a positive manner and having a building block going into our offseason,” Brown said. “We need to finish this on a positive note.”

Bowling Green transfer quarterback Jarret Doege is 59 of 85 passing (69.4%) for 660 yards with five touchdowns and no interceptions in three games. He started the last two and will retain his eligibility as a junior next season even after playing the finale.

“I think they like the way he throws the ball around. They’ve changed the offense,” Patterson said.

Brown has had to deal with youth, injuries and players leaving the team. He found a positive in the Oklahoma State loss, with the Cowboys getting held to 285 yards and national rushing leader Chuba Hubbard’s 106 rushing yards being his fewest since early September.

“Defensively, overall, a really good performance. We got fatigued in the fourth quarter,” Brown said. “Some of that is because we don’t have a whole lot of depth. The defensive line and the secondary, it’s kind of a culmination into Week 11 playing a lot of snaps.”

Five of TCU’s six losses this season are by a touchdown or less, including 28-24 at No. 7 Oklahoma last Saturday night, when the Frogs thought they had forced a fourth down late before the reviewed spot gave the Sooners a first down and allowed them to run out the clock.

“It means that we’re close. It means we haven’t made enough plays,” Patterson said of all the one-score games. “It means that you have enough ability to be close, but … either we’re screwing things up or we’re not making the right calls, or we’re not right there yet to be able to make those plays.”

Wallow leads the Big 12 with 10.3 tackles per game, and his 113 total tackles (68 solo, 45 assists) are nearly twice as many as the next-closest TCU player: sophomore safety Trevon Moehrig has 58.

“It’s not a good thing when somebody has this many tackles. That means a lot of guys are not making tackles,” Patterson said. “In respect to Garret, is you have the ability to make those tackles. … He’s one of our leaders. He’s been a captain all year, and we’re glad he’s coming back next year.”

Categories: Sports | WVU
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.