WVU offense breaks slump in beating N.C. State | TribLIVE.com
WVU

WVU offense breaks slump in beating N.C. State

Associated Press
1675694_web1_1675694-c75c3e6b8ced4cbba7ee091aa93fe32f
AP
West Virginia wide receiver Sam James scores the Mountaineers’ first touchdown during the first half against N.C. State.

MORGANTOWN, W.Va. — Austin Kendall and Kennedy McKoy made sure West Virginia didn’t repeat a miserable offensive showing from its previous game.

Kendall threw three touchdown passes to lead West Virginia to a 44-27 victory over N.C. State on Saturday.

McKoy helped West Virginia’s run game break out of a slump with a pair of scores, and the Mountaineers (2-1) had by far their highest offensive production of the season one week after looking lethargic in a 38-7 loss at Missouri.

“For us to play winning football, we have to identity ourselves as a blue-collar unit,” West Virginia coach Neal Brown said. “We have to outwork people. We have to outphysical people. And we embraced that this week. I think what you saw on that field today was a product of that.”

Kendall threw two interceptions against Missouri and had another pick Saturday but overcame that with mostly solid decisions. Kendall had first-half TD tosses of 20 and 13 yards. His 25-yard run early in the fourth quarter set up his 9-yard scoring toss to freshman Ali Jennings for a 38-27 lead.

Kendall went 27 of 40 for 272 yards.

West Virginia broke a 21-21 halftime tie with the help of its special teams and defense, which had been criticized by the coaching staff for 22 missed tackles a week ago.

N.C. State (2-1) managed just 97 yards of offense in the second half. Sophomore Matthew McKay threw a first-quarter touchdown pass but was harassed all game in his first road start.

McKay finished 23 of 48 for 207 yards. He was 9 of 24 for 72 yards after halftime.

West Virginia’s McKoy had a 23-yard TD run in the first quarter and scored from 5 yards in the third after Logan Thimons blocked a N.C. State punt at the 12.

After combining for 27 points in its first two games, West Virginia finished with 445 yards of offense Saturday and avoided its worst three-game start to a season in 11 years.

“I told them, I said, they got embarrassed last week at Missouri. You’re going to get their best,” said N.C. State coach Dave Doeren. “They’re going to come home and not want to show that to their fans. I knew that was coming. I told them that was coming.”

Facing its first Power 5 opponent, the Wolfpack ran 18 more offensive plays than West Virginia but fell flat. They were limited to two second-half field goals after outscoring their first two opponents 75-6.

The Mountaineers entered the game with an FBS-worst 1.1 yard per rushing attempt and wasn’t expected to improve much with the pregame announcement that right guard Josh Sills would miss the game with an injured shoulder, and left guard Michael Brown was out with an illness. But West Virginia’s offense avoided the middle for most of the game. Its most effective plays went to the outside and through laterals.

McKoy said he saw a big difference in blocking compared with the previous two games.

“When you get that movement, it makes it easier for us running backs to find those holes,” he said.

Three freshmen receivers helped infuse some needed life into West Virginia’s offense.

Sam James caught nine passes for 155 yards and a score, Winston Wright had four catches for 13 yards and Jennings had three catches for 28 yards, including the fourth-quarter TD.

Categories: Sports | WVU
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.