WVU’s Grier, Cajuste go to Panthers, Patriots near end of third round | TribLIVE.com

WVU’s Grier, Cajuste go to Panthers, Patriots near end of third round

Jerry DiPaola
West Virginia quarterback Will Grier will skip the team’s bowl game so he can prepare for the NFL Draft.

West Virginia quarterback Will Grier and offensive tackle Yodny Cajuste were picked back-to-back near the end of the third round Friday night.

Grier, who grew up in Charlotte, N.C., went to the Carolina Panthers with the 101st overall pick and was the fifth quarterback chosen over the first three rounds. Cajuste was picked at 102 by the New England Patriots.

Both players skipped the Mountaineers’ 34-18 loss to Syracuse in the Camping World Bowl to prepare for the draft.

Grier, a transfer from Florida, played the past two seasons for the Mountaineers. In his first season in Morgantown, Grier was an honorable mention All-Big 12 pick and ranked eighth in the FBS in touchdown passes (34) and average yards per game (317.3).

Then, he had an outstanding senior season, with a 175.5 passing efficiency, 37 touchdown passes, 3,864 yards and a 67 completion percentage. He started 11 games, earned second-team All-Big 12 honors and finished fourth in the Heisman Trophy voting.

Cajuste was a second-team All-Big 12 choice in 2017. Last season, he shared the Big 12 Offensive Lineman of the Year award with Kansas State’s Dalton Risner and Oklahoma’s Dru Samia and started 11 games at left tackle.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | WVU
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.