ShareThis Page
Zach Aston-Reese probable, Dominik Simon likely out for Penguins vs. Oilers |

Zach Aston-Reese probable, Dominik Simon likely out for Penguins vs. Oilers

Jonathan Bombulie
Florida Panthers’ Colton Sceviour (7) and Pittsburgh Penguins’ Zach Aston-Reese (46) fight during the third period of an NHL hockey game Tuesday, Jan. 8, 2019, in Pittsburgh. Both players were penalized. The Penguins won 5-1.

Pittsburgh Penguins winger Zach Aston-Reese won’t be looking to pick any fights against the Edmonton Oilers on Wednesday night.

Other than that, he’s ready to go.

Out since suffering a hand injury in a Jan. 8 fight, Aston-Reese is probable to make his return to the lineup against the Oilers.

“Maybe right now, just for the time being,” Aston-Reese said when asked if he’d shy away from fisticuffs. “You don’t want to reinjure it, especially coming back. I don’t know. Give it a couple weeks maybe.”

Aston-Reese, who had two goals and two assists in his last six games before the injury, skated on the fourth line with Matt Cullen and Garrett Wilson at morning skate.

“I’ve been doing a lot of skill work, but that’s not my game,” Aston-Reese said. “I’m excited. I’m back with Cully and Willy. I felt we had a lot of chemistry early on in the year and know how to play that grind game.”

Based on morning skate personnel groupings, Teddy Blueger is also set to return to the lineup after missing Monday’s game in Philadelphia as a healthy scratch. He skated on the left side of the third line with Jared McCann and Patric Hornqvist.

Dominik Simon, who has been held without a point in his past six games, will likely be a healthy scratch.

Coming off a 50-save performance in Philadelphia, Matt Murray is scheduled to start in goal.

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.