Greensburg Central Catholic grad Olivia Zambruno reaches semifinals of state amateur |
Other Local

Greensburg Central Catholic grad Olivia Zambruno reaches semifinals of state amateur

Bill Beckner

Rising Penn State junior golfer Olivia Zambruno remained in the chase for a title at the 83rd Pennsylvania Women’s Amateur Championship at Philadelphia Cricket Club’s Militia Hill course.

A Greensburg Central Catholic graduate, Zambruno downed Julia McLaughlin of Saucon Valley Country Club, 5 & 4, in a quarterfinal match Friday in the championship bracket.

A Pleasant Valley Golf Club member, Zambruno went ahead with a par (4) on the seventh hole and added to her lead by winning five of the next six holes before closing the match with a par on the par-5 No. 14.

Another area player to reach the semifinals is Nina Busch, an incoming sophomore at Fox Chapel who plays out of Oakmont Country Club.

Busch topped Muffy McCabe of Philadelphia Country Club, 3 & 2.

Former Hempfield and North Carolina star Katie Miller, meanwhile, lost to Morgan Frazier, a rising Navy senior, 3 & 2. Miller, a three-time state amateur champion who calls Ligonier Country Club her home course, never led in the quarterfinal match.

Semifinal matches on Saturday morning have Zambruno facing Samantha Staudt (Applecross Country Club) and Busch going against Jackie Rogowicz (Yardley Country Club).

The championship match is Saturday afternoon.

Full results here.

Bill Beckner Jr. is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bill by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Other Local
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.