ShareThis Page

Estey firing from Hershey Trust quickly followed criminal revelations

Tom Fontaine
| Monday, May 2, 2016, 4:21 p.m.

The revelation Friday that a senior executive swindled undercover FBI agents out of $13,000 prompted the $12 billion Hershey Trust Company to convene an emergency meeting to fire the employee on the same day, a trust spokesman said.

John Estey, 53, of Ardmore, a former executive vice president at Hershey Trust Company, has agreed to plead guilty to federal wire fraud charges in connection with an FBI investigation of Harrisburg lobbying activities.

“The charge is not related to the Hershey Trust Company. The company had no prior knowledge that Estey was a target of a federal investigation,” said Kent Jarrell, a spokesman for the Hershey Trust Company's board of directors.

The trust's 10-person board moved quickly to fire Estey after federal prosecutors in the Harrisburg-based Middle District of Pennsylvania revealed the plea deal. A federal tax filing showed Estey earned $735,919 in compensation from Hershey in the 2013 tax year.

Estey could not be reached. Ronald H. Levine, an attorney representing Estey in the federal case, did not return a message but said Friday that his client was “sorry for his mistakes. He has resolved this matter with the government and he hopes to move on with his life.”

According to federal court documents, Estey, a onetime chief of staff to former Gov. Ed Rendell, took $20,000 in May 2011 from an undercover business created by the FBI. He promised to use the money to make campaign contributions to state lawmakers who could take — or not take — legislative action that would benefit the business.

By the end of June 2011, Estey “conveyed the impression that the $20,000 had passed through or would be passed through” to the lawmakers, but the court documents said Estey had already “converted $13,000 of the $20,000 to his own use.”

In late September 2011, Hershey Trust Company hired Estey, then a partner at the powerful Philadelphia-based law firm Ballard Spahr, as general counsel. Candy magnate Milton Hershey and two other men created the trust in 1905, and today, its enormous assets help fund the Milton Hershey School, a boarding school for economically disadvantaged children.

At the time of Estey's hire, the state Attorney General's office was investigating the activities of the trust and related entities.

In May 2013, Attorney General Kathleen Kane said her office's investigation revealed no wrongdoing and that it negotiated a deal in which Hershey Trust Company and related entities would implement a series of reforms aimed at preventing trust assets from being misused “for excessive board compensation and benefits, questionable land purchases and unnecessary facility upgrades.”

At the time, Adrian King — Estey's brother-in-law, who served as a former Rendell deputy chief of staff under Estey — was Kane's first deputy attorney general. King left Kane's office in mid-2014 as a grand jury investigation hung over the office and went to Ballard Spahr to run the firm's government relations, regulatory affairs and contracting practice group.

The Philadelphia Inquirer, citing unnamed sources, reported that Estey has cooperated with the FBI probe since 2011.

Tom Fontaine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7847 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me