ShareThis Page
Pennsylvania

Justices ponder tossing out Pa. congressional map

| Wednesday, Jan. 17, 2018, 1:03 p.m.

HARRISBURG, Pa. — A challenge by Democratic voters to Pennsylvania's Republican-crafted congressional district map could determine how much partisan gerrymandering is too much.

State Supreme Court justices held argument Wednesday about whether the map of 18 congressional districts violates the state constitution and if so, what the court should do about it.

The Republican legislative leaders who were sued over the map say partisan elements aren't surprising in a document drafted by elected officials.

If the justices order a new map, the Republican leaders don't want it in place before 2020.

The plaintiffs say the maps are discriminatory, arguing their rights to political expression and association have been harmed.

They want lawmakers to be given a couple weeks to attempt to pass a replacement before the high court would take over the task.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me