ShareThis Page
Pennsylvania

Shell's Falcon Ethane Pipeline will cross 9 Pennsylvania municipalities, FracTracker says

Dillon Carr
| Monday, Jan. 29, 2018, 1:03 p.m.
An artist's rendering of what Royal Dutch Shell's proposed ethane cracker plant in Beaver County might look like when completed.
Royal Dutch Shell
An artist's rendering of what Royal Dutch Shell's proposed ethane cracker plant in Beaver County might look like when completed.
This map shows the route of a 97-mile ethane pipeline that will feed Shell's cracker plant in Beaver County early next decade. The Pennsylvania townships included along the route are Chartiers, Mt. Pleasant, Robinson, North Fayette, Findlay, Independence, Raccoon, Potter and Greene.
Submitted
This map shows the route of a 97-mile ethane pipeline that will feed Shell's cracker plant in Beaver County early next decade. The Pennsylvania townships included along the route are Chartiers, Mt. Pleasant, Robinson, North Fayette, Findlay, Independence, Raccoon, Potter and Greene.

An ethane pipeline that will feed Shell's proposed petrochemical "cracker" plant in Beaver County early next decade is expected to traverse nine municipalities in Western Pennsylvania, according to an oil and gas industry watchdog group trying to raise awareness about the pipeline's path.

FracTracker Alliance released detailed maps Monday on its website of the 97-mile Falcon Ethane Pipeline that show the pipelines crosses a total of 22 townships in Ohio, West Virginia and Pennsylvania.

In Pennsylvania, the nine are: Chartiers, Mt. Pleasant, Robinson, North Fayette, Findlay, Independence, Raccoon, Potter and Greene.

View Map Fullscreen | How FracTracker Maps Work

The pipeline project, owned by a Shell subsidiary, is awaiting permits from the state Department of Environmental Protection.

Lauren Fraley, a DEP spokeswoman, said the project is under technical review by the agency until Feb. 20. Public comments may be submitted before then.

Kirk Jalbert, FracTracker's project lead, said he hopes the analysis will encourage public involvement before DEP issues permits.

"We used the exact information that Shell provided to the DEP. The difference is we simplified it and contextualized it to make it all more palatable to the public," he said.

Three environmental groups asked for an additional 30 days for public comments on Monday due to their concerns with the pipeline's route. The groups, Citizens to Protect the Ambridge Reservoir, the Breathe Project and the Ambridge Water Authority, also requested a public meeting with the DEP in Ambridge to address the concerns.

A CPAR press release Monday said an explosion of the pipeline would endanger 550 homes, 20 businesses, 240 groundwater wells, 12 public parks, five schools, six daycare centers and tributaries to the Ambridge Reservoir that are within 1,000 feet of the pipeline.

Ray Fisher, a Shell spokesman, said the company is committed to constructing and operating the pipeline in "a safe and environmentally sound manner."

"Shell studied elevation and topography data to determine the best possible construction route that could create the least amount of impacts to water resources, environmentally sensitive areas, local communities and private landowners," Fisher said in an email. He added that Shell has met with officials from the Army Corps of Engineers, DEP and county and township leaders since 2016 to evaluate the route.

"Shell Pipeline welcomes the community participating in the DEP's public comment periods," Fisher said.

FracTracker's analysis took more than a year to complete, Jalbert said. The data came from Shell's DEP permit applications and a public database maintained by the company's engineering firm AECOM of Los Angeles. That database can be found here .

There are 24 homes and three businesses within 300 feet from the pipeline's route in Raccoon, Independence and Mt. Pleasant townships, the maps show. The nonprofit considers those structures to be "at risk" in the event of a pipeline leak or explosion, Jalbert said.

The U.S. Department of Transportation's Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration classifies ethane as a hazardous, flammable liquid.

Data show one injury that resulted in hospitalization from nine pipeline incidents since 1997 that involved Highly Volatile Liquids like ethane, propane and butylene. The figures don't include pipelines carrying natural gas.

In Findlay, Shell intends to run its pipeline through a housing development proposed by Maronda Homes. The housing development firm could not be reached for comment.

The entire Falcon Ethane Pipeline will intersect 319 streams and 174 wetlands, the maps show.

It is expected to carry 107,000 barrels of ethane daily to Shell's $6 billion plant being built along the Ohio River in Potter, Beaver County. Construction of the pipeline is expected to begin late 2018. The cracker plant and its pipeline are expected to be operational in 2020.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-871-2325, dcarr@tribweb.com or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me