ShareThis Page
Pennsylvania

Drilling remains steady in Marcellus, Utica regions

| Monday, Feb. 12, 2018, 3:54 p.m.
The Marcellus Shale contains natural gas, which is obtained through hydraulic fracturing, a technique in which millions of gallons of water, sand and chemicals are pumped underground to break apart the rock.
Julia Schmalz/Bloomberg
The Marcellus Shale contains natural gas, which is obtained through hydraulic fracturing, a technique in which millions of gallons of water, sand and chemicals are pumped underground to break apart the rock.
Bloomberg

Drilling activity in the Marcellus and Utica shale area kept a steady pace in January, according to the Energy Information Administration.

The Appalachia region, which contains both shales, runs from the southwest corner of New York, diagonally through Pennsylvania and covers the eastern part of Ohio and all of West Virginia.

The region had 76 rigs drilling wells on Jan. 18, which is two more than were operating in the region on Dec. 17, according to the data.

Every new well in Appalachia is producing about 14,795 thousand cubic feet per day. The next highest new well production is 8,137 thousand cubic feet per day in the Haynesville shale, which straddles the Arkansas, Louisiana and Texas borders.

New and existing wells in the Appalachia region are producing about 26,829 million cubic feet per day, which is about 42 percent of the national natural gas production from the shale structures.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me