ShareThis Page
Pennsylvania

Pa. fire chief resigns after sex offender status uncovered

Jacob Tierney
| Tuesday, Feb. 13, 2018, 6:48 a.m.
Roger L. Gilbert Jr.
Pennsylvania Megan's Law Website
Roger L. Gilbert Jr.

The fire chief in a tiny Crawford County borough has resigned after his status as a sex offender came to light.

The Corry Journal reported that Chief Roger Gilbert Jr. was convicted in 2001 of sexual intercourse with a 4-year-old girl and is listed in the state's Megan's Law database.

Gilbert, 43, who was in his second term as chief of the Spartansburg Volunteer Fire Department, told the Journal he had resigned.

“I want you to know that I have officially resigned as chief, and even more, I've pulled out of the fire department completely,” he told the Journal. “I will no longer be affiliated with any organization that helps anyone.”

The fire department issued a statement after Gilbert's resignation.

“The Spartansburg Volunteer Fire Department exists with a mission to serve and support the greater community and surrounding area,” the statement said, according to the Journal. “As an organization, we do not want to distract from our mission to serve. Mr. Gilbert has voluntarily resigned from his position, and we support his decision.”

Leaders of the 300-resident borough, including Mayor Ann Louise Wagner, initially said they were aware of Gilbert's conviction. Wagner said she supported the department's decision to elect him chief.

Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-836-6646, jtierney@tribweb.com or via Twitter @Soolseem.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me