ShareThis Page
Pennsylvania

Toomey, Casey react to Kavanaugh nomination

Wes Venteicher
| Tuesday, July 10, 2018, 11:09 a.m.
Judge Brett Kavanaugh, President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee stands in the East Room of the White House, Monday, July 9, 2018, in Washington.   (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
Judge Brett Kavanaugh, President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee stands in the East Room of the White House, Monday, July 9, 2018, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

Pennsylvania’s U.S. senators split along predictable lines in their reactions to President Donald Trump’s nomination of Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court on Monday, with Lehigh Valley Republican Pat Toomey supporting Kavanaugh and Scranton Democrat Bob Casey opposing the selection.

Trump nominated Kavanaugh, 53, a Washington, D.C., Circuit Court of Appeals judge appointed by George W. Bush, over Pittsburgh judge Thomas Hardiman.

“I was pleased to see President Trump nominate Judge Brett Kavanaugh to a seat on the Supreme Court of the United States,” Toomey said in a statement. “Based on his reputation and resume, Judge Kavanaugh appears to have the intellect and experience necessary to serve on our nation’s highest court.”

Toomey stopped short of committing to a confirmation vote for Kavanaugh.

“Judicial nominees, including those for the Supreme Court, should understand that the proper role of a judge is to apply the law, including the U.S. Constitution, as written,” Toomey said in a statement. “I plan to apply this standard while reviewing Judge Kavanaugh’s record and I hope my colleagues will do the same so Republicans and Democrats can work together to confirm highly qualified jurists.”

Casey said Monday he would oppose whoever Trump picked for the seat that will open when Justice Anthony Kennedy, considered the court’s swing vote, retires at the end of the month.

Casey objected to the process by which Trump is picking his nominees, drawing from a list of 25 candidates that conservative organizations such as the Heritage Foundation and the Federalist Society helped develop.

“This is really about the process and whether or not the corporate right is going to be in charge of picking the Supreme Court in a seat, in a nomination that’s likely to tip the scales substantially,” Casey told reporters.

U.S. Rep. Lou Barletta, R-Hazleton, who is running against Casey for the U.S. Senate this fall, said in a statement that he supports Kavanaugh, calling him “one of the nation’s most respected conservative legal minds” with a “strong record of respecting the rule of law.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me