ShareThis Page
Pennsylvania

Libertarian files to get on Pennsylvania's U.S. Senate ballot

| Friday, July 27, 2018, 1:30 p.m.
Dale Kerns said his campaign filed roughly 11,000 voter signatures Friday, July 27, 2018, more than double the legal threshold. The deadline is next Wednesday.
Dale Kerns said his campaign filed roughly 11,000 voter signatures Friday, July 27, 2018, more than double the legal threshold. The deadline is next Wednesday.

HARRISBURG – The Libertarian Party of Pennsylvania’s nominee for U.S. Senate is filing signatures to get on November’s election ballot against Democratic U.S. Sen. Bob Casey and his Republican challenger Lou Barletta.

Dale Kerns said his campaign filed roughly 11,000 voter signatures Friday, more than double the legal threshold. The deadline is next Wednesday.

Kerns is a 34-year-old electrical construction project manager from Delaware County making his first bid for statewide office.

He is a free-market advocate who switched his registration from Republican in 2016 and, in 2012, was a supporter of former U.S. Rep. Ron Paul, a favorite of libertarians and tea party conservatives.

Kerns accuses Barletta and Casey of being part of the establishment, and says he supports free market solutions and more citizen involvement in government.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me