ShareThis Page
Pennsylvania

Some of ex-Pennsylvania congressman's convictions tossed

| Thursday, Aug. 9, 2018, 7:33 p.m.
FILE- In this June 21, 2016, file photo, Rep. Chaka Fattah, D-Pa., walks after leaving the federal courthouse in Philadelphia.  A federal appeals court has overturned the ex-Pennsylvania congressman's bribery convictions, but has let stand guilty verdicts on numerous other counts. The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Thursday, Aug. 9, 2018,  that Fattah, who is serving a 10-year prison sentence, and an associate are eligible for a retrial on the charges it threw out.  (AP Photo/Matt Rourke, File)
FILE- In this June 21, 2016, file photo, Rep. Chaka Fattah, D-Pa., walks after leaving the federal courthouse in Philadelphia. A federal appeals court has overturned the ex-Pennsylvania congressman's bribery convictions, but has let stand guilty verdicts on numerous other counts. The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Thursday, Aug. 9, 2018, that Fattah, who is serving a 10-year prison sentence, and an associate are eligible for a retrial on the charges it threw out. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke, File)

A federal appeals court on Thursday threw out some of the convictions for which a Pennsylvania ex-congressman is serving a decade-long prison term but upheld and reinstated other counts.

The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned four criminal convictions against former U.S. Rep. Chaka Fattah, a Philadelphia Democrat, citing in part a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision that narrowed the definition of political graft.

The judges said federal prosecutors could retry Fattah and co-defendant Herbert Vederman for conspiracy, bribery and money laundering. The appeals court also reinstated the convictions of both men for bank fraud and making false statements to banks.

The U.S. attorney’s office in Philadelphia said it was reviewing the decision. Fattah’s lawyer declined comment and Vederman’s did not return messages.

Fattah’s legal trouble relates to his unsuccessful run for the Democratic nomination for Philadelphia mayor in 2007. He routed a $1 million loan through a consultant, then reversed the secretive moves through a charity and others when the debt was called.

Fattah is a former state lawmaker who spent two decades in Congress before his 2016 conviction on charges that also included racketeering, fraud and obstruction.

The newly dismissed charges involve allegations Fattah accepted “things of value” from businessman Vederman, described as his personal friend, in return for arranging a meeting between him and the U.S. trade representative; unsuccessfully trying to get Vederman an ambassadorship; and hiring Vederman’s longtime girlfriend, Alexandra Zionts, for two months on his congressional staff in Philadelphia.

The three-judge appeals panel, citing a U.S. Supreme Court decision in overturning the public corruption convictions of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, said the trade representative meeting was not illegal and that Fattah’s work to get Vederman an ambassadorial appointment needed to be reviewed by a jury that was properly instructed about the relevant law.

The court said jurors could decide if Fattah’s acts regarding the potential ambassadorship — three emails, two letters and a phone call — constituted the type of “decision” or “action” needed to support the charge. As part of his efforts, Fattah hand-delivered a letter about Vederman to then-President Barack Obama in 2010.

“Determining, for example, just how forceful a strongly worded letter of recommendation must be before it becomes impermissible ‘pressure or advice’ is a fact-intensive inquiry that falls within the domain of a properly instructed jury,” the judges wrote.

The judges said hiring Zionts was “clearly an official act. But because we cannot isolate the jury’s consideration of the hiring from the first two categories of charged act, we must reverse and remand.”

Two other dismissed counts, money laundering and conspiracy, revolved around allegations Vederman provided $18,000 to help Fattah purchase a vacation home in the Pocono Mountains.

The reinstated bank fraud and false statements charges against both men involve how the $18,000 was described in obtaining a mortgage. Vederman agreed to purchase Fattah’s wife’s 1989 Porche, when in fact she retained the vehicle and it was found by federal agents when they raided the Fattahs’ home and garage in 2014, the judges said.

Fattah is currently in a federal prison in northwestern Pennsylvania, with a release date of 2025.

In addition to the bribery case, he was convicted of using more than $600,000 in government grants and nonprofit funds on personal and campaign expenses.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me