ShareThis Page
Pennsylvania

Marcellus Shale contributing to recent growth in U.S. natural gas production, agency says

Stephen Huba
| Tuesday, Aug. 28, 2018, 4:36 p.m.
The Poseidon well pad in Penn Township. (Submitted)
Submitted
The Poseidon well pad in Penn Township. (Submitted)

The Marcellus shale play is driving much of the recent growth in U.S. natural gas production, the U.S. Energy Information Administration said Tuesday.

Gross production of natural gas in the United States has been increasing for more than a decade and, in recent months, has been more than 10 percent higher than in 2017, the EIA said.

The growth has been driven by production in the Appalachian Basin (Marcellus and Utica shale) in the Northeast, the Permian Basin in western Texas and New Mexico, and the Haynesville shale in Texas and Louisiana.

The three regions collectively accounted for less than 15 percent of total U.S. natural gas production as recently as 2007, but now they account for nearly 50 percent of total production, the EIA said.

Growth in natural gas production in the Northeast has come mainly from the Marcellus and Utica shale plays in the Appalachian basin, which collectively accounted for about 29 percent of total production in July 2018, the EIA said.

Production has increased partly because of new drilling and completion techniques, including hydraulic fracturing, or fracking.

Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Stephen at 724-850-1280, shuba@tribweb.com or via Twitter @shuba_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me