ShareThis Page
Pennsylvania

Scott Wagner: I'll sue painkiller makers to recoup addiction costs

| Wednesday, Sept. 12, 2018, 2:45 p.m.
Scott Wagner, Republican nominee for Pennsylvania governor, speaks during a candidate’s forum at the Manufacturer & Business Association in Erie on Aug. 28, 2018. (Christopher Millette/Erie Times-News/AP)
Scott Wagner, Republican nominee for Pennsylvania governor, speaks during a candidate’s forum at the Manufacturer & Business Association in Erie on Aug. 28, 2018. (Christopher Millette/Erie Times-News/AP)

YORK — Republican gubernatorial candidate Scott Wagner says he’d sue the makers of prescription painkillers to recoup Pennsylvania’s cost of dealing with opioid-related addiction.

Wagner made the announcement Wednesday as part of a plan to attack what he says is a worsening problem.

Last year, Pennsylvania’s attorney general, Josh Shapiro, and 40 other state attorneys general said they had served subpoenas requesting information from companies that make prescription painkillers and demanded information from three distributors.

Gov. Tom Wolf’s campaign says the Democrat supports Shapiro’s efforts.

A federal judge in Cleveland is handling more than 1,000 lawsuits against the industry. The plaintiffs are mostly local governments and Native American tribes. Hundreds of other local governments are suing in state courts across the country, while other state governments have sued in state court.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me