ShareThis Page
Pennsylvania

Backers of child sex abuse lawsuit window rally in Capitol

| Wednesday, Oct. 24, 2018, 5:09 p.m.
Cindy Leech, left, of Johnstown, Pa., cries during a rally Wednesday Oct. 24, 2018, at the Capitol in Harrisburg, Pa. More than 100 people rallied at the state Capitol Wednesday following the Senate’s GOP majority’s decision last week to leave Harrisburg without voting on a bill that would give victims a two-year window to file lawsuits that would otherwise be outdated. Leech’s son Corey, an abuse victim who testified against his abuser, died in 2016.
Cindy Leech, left, of Johnstown, Pa., cries during a rally Wednesday Oct. 24, 2018, at the Capitol in Harrisburg, Pa. More than 100 people rallied at the state Capitol Wednesday following the Senate’s GOP majority’s decision last week to leave Harrisburg without voting on a bill that would give victims a two-year window to file lawsuits that would otherwise be outdated. Leech’s son Corey, an abuse victim who testified against his abuser, died in 2016.
A rally is held Wednesday Oct. 24, 2018, in the rotunda at the Capitol in Harrisburg, Pa. Survivors of child sexual abuse and others are ramping up pressure on Pennsylvania’s Republican senators to vote on a bill to would give victims a two-year window to file lawsuits that would otherwise be outdated. More than 100 people rallied at the state Capitol Wednesday following the Senate’s GOP majority’s decision last week to leave Harrisburg without voting on the legislation.
A rally is held Wednesday Oct. 24, 2018, in the rotunda at the Capitol in Harrisburg, Pa. Survivors of child sexual abuse and others are ramping up pressure on Pennsylvania’s Republican senators to vote on a bill to would give victims a two-year window to file lawsuits that would otherwise be outdated. More than 100 people rallied at the state Capitol Wednesday following the Senate’s GOP majority’s decision last week to leave Harrisburg without voting on the legislation.
A rally participant cries as assault victim Michael Broussard speaks Wednesday Oct. 24, 2018, at the Capitol in Harrisburg. More than 100 people rallied Wednesday at the state Capitol after the Senate’s GOP majority’s decision last week to leave Harrisburg without voting on a bill that would give victims a two-year window to file lawsuits that would otherwise be outdated.
A rally participant cries as assault victim Michael Broussard speaks Wednesday Oct. 24, 2018, at the Capitol in Harrisburg. More than 100 people rallied Wednesday at the state Capitol after the Senate’s GOP majority’s decision last week to leave Harrisburg without voting on a bill that would give victims a two-year window to file lawsuits that would otherwise be outdated.

HARRISBURG — Survivors of child sexual abuse and others sought Wednesday to ramp up pressure on Pennsylvania’s Republican senators to vote on a bill that would give victims a two-year window to file lawsuits that would otherwise be outdated.

More than 100 people rallied at the state Capitol, nearly a week after the Senate’s GOP majority decided to leave Harrisburg without voting on the legislation.

Several speakers focused their frustration on the Senate’s top-ranking Republican, President Pro Tempore Joe Scarnati of Jefferson County.

“The problem is that only one person has the power to pick up that phone and call them back,” said state victim advocate Jennifer Storm, referring to Scarnati. “It’s one vote, it’s one day.”

Scarnati issued a statement that said Democrats have been “touting this as a campaign commercial just as predicted.”

He said he hoped additional talks can produce a compromise.

“Unfortunately at this point I have still not received any compromise proposal. If the attorney general or whomever is negotiating this bill in the House produces a counterproposal that 26 senators can support, I will call the Senate back for a vote,” Scarnati said.

Speaking at the rally, abuse victim Shaun Dougherty of Johnstown said political considerations are behind the bill’s opposition.

“I believe politics did play a role, however, not by us,” he said. “We’re fighting for our lives.”

Existing state law gives victims until age 30 to sue over child sexual abuse, but Scarnati and others have argued that changing that retroactively will violate the state constitution. It would also expose the Roman Catholic Church, other institutions and insurers to lawsuits likely to cost them a fortune.

A grand jury report issued in August alleged hundreds of Roman Catholic priests had abused more than 1,000 children over seven decades and described how church officials covered it up. The report provided harrowing detail of the abuse, which in some cases involved priests using crosses and other elements of the faith to violate children.

Since the report’s release, the attorney general’s office has received more than 1,300 calls to a hotline set up to field complaints about child sexual abuse, and the federal prosecutor in Philadelphia has issued subpoenas to the state’s eight dioceses.

Scarnati, who has supported the creation of a church-backed victims’ fund as an alternative, said the legislation that passed the House overwhelmingly left out two of the grand jury’s recommendations and would not treat all types of victims uniformly.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me