ShareThis Page
Pennsylvania

Scarnati continues to oppose window of opportunity law for abuse survivors

Deb Erdley
| Wednesday, Dec. 5, 2018, 5:03 p.m.
Pennsylvania Sen. Joe Scarnati
Natalie Cake/Roxbury News
Pennsylvania Sen. Joe Scarnati

Our friends at Capitolwire snared a sit down this week with Pennsylvania Senate President Pro Tem Joe Scarnati, R-Brookville.

Scarnati chalked up headlines earlier this fall as the man who blocked a bill granting adult sexual abuse survivors an opportunity to sue their abusers outside of the statute of limitations.

The Senate’s leading Republican still isn’t happy about the spirited debate that lasted until near midnight of the Senate’s final session day.

“I continue to say that it became more about elections and campaigns than it did about getting the issue done. Now, we’re past the elections, we’re past the campaigns. Victims need to be compensated, so I’m very pleased to see what the dioceses are doing, and I think that the issue should maybe become a bit more civil and a bit more respectful of other’s positions,” Scarnati told Capitolwire Bureau Chief Chris Comisac.

Although regional dioceses across the state have announced the launch of compensation funds to pay reparations to survivors whose abuse occurred years ago, victim advocates insist that falls short of holding the church accountable.

While they aren’t discouraging survivors from applying to the funds, they continue to call for a bill that would give adults barred by the statute of limitations an opportunity to take their abusers to court. Scarnati, however, remained adamant that he’ll oppose such a move if the bill that passed the House by a large margin comes back to the Senate in the same form.

Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Deb at 412-320-7996, derdley@tribweb.com or via Twitter @deberdley_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me