ShareThis Page
Nation

Teen pleads not guilty in Ohio school shootings

| Friday, June 8, 2012, 8:40 p.m.

CHARDON, Ohio -- A teenager pleaded not guilty Friday in the fatal shootings of three students and the wounding of threein a high school cafeteria in suburban Cleveland.

During his first court appearance since being indicted this week on charges of aggravated murder, attempted aggravated murder and felonious assault, T.J. Lane, 17, told a judge that he understands the charges.

Lane will be tried as an adult in the Feb. 27 shootings at Chardon High School. He could face life in prison if convicted.

Geauga County Common Pleas Judge Forrest Burt set Lane's bond at $1 million.

Prosecutors have said Lane has admitted taking a .22-caliber pistol and a knife to the high school and firing 10 shots at a group of students sitting at a cafeteria table at the start of the school day. A sheriff's deputy testified at a hearing in May that Lane was wearing a T-shirt with the word "Killer" when he was found about a mile from the school.

Killed in the attacks were Demetrius Hewlin, 16; Russell King Jr., 17; and Daniel Parmertor, 16.

Lane's attorneys, who have been under a gag order, have not said what their defense strategy will be at trial. A message was left yesterday with Mark DeVan, one of his attorneys.

Questions about Lane's competency have come up at earlier hearings.

A judge said in May that Lane is mentally competent to stand trial in juvenile court. A psychiatrist who examined Lane testified that the teen sometimes loses touch with reality and suffers from hallucinations, psychosis and fantasies.

The psychiatrist said none of the symptoms would prevent Lane from understanding the case against him and helping in his defense.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me