ShareThis Page
Nation

Uncle: Family of suspect in Virginia shootings stunned

| Sunday, April 14, 2013, 10:03 p.m.

The family of a man charged with wounding two women in a community college shooting in southwest Virginia is stunned and worried about the school's students and faculty, the suspect's uncle said on Sunday.

“It's a very difficult situation,” Stewart MacInnis said.

Police arrested MacInnis' nephew, 18-year-old Neil Allan MacInnis, minutes after the shootings on Friday at a satellite campus of New River Community College in a mall in Christiansburg. MacInnis was being held on Sunday at the Montgomery County Jail.

“We're just absolutely stunned, devastated,” Stewart MacInnis said. “We are concerned about the victims and the families. We wish them the best. This is a tough situation for them. They deserve to get well quickly and completely.”

He also showed concern for bystanders.

“This has impacted them greatly as well, and our thoughts are with them as well. For the students, we just hope that they continue their studies. It's a barrier that I hope they can get over and continue,” said Stewart MacInnis, director of media relations at Virginia Military Institute in Lexington.

Investigators said on Friday that they don't know what motivated the shootings. Authorities have not said what type of weapon was used or how it was obtained.

A Christiansburg spokeswoman, Becky Wilburn, wrote in an email on Sunday that the victims' names won't be released to protect their privacy. She also said authorities do not plan to provide further information on their conditions.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me