ShareThis Page
Nation

Iraq War vet to get $645K in California police beating

| Wednesday, Dec. 11, 2013, 8:36 p.m.

OAKLAND, Calif. — The city of Oakland has agreed to settle a claim by an Iraq War veteran who was beaten by a police officer during an Occupy Oakland protest two years ago.

According to the Oakland Tribune, the City Council on Tuesday unanimously agreed to pay $645,000 to Kayvan Sabeghi, 34, who underwent surgery for a lacerated spleen and was hospitalized for five days.

Sabeghi's lawsuit claimed sheriff's jailers denied him medical care and mocked him before he got treatment during his 18 hours in custody.

He had been arrested for remaining at the scene of a riot, but he was never charged.

The Tribune reports that the sum is the largest awarded so far to anyone injured during a string of Occupy Oakland protests in late 2011 and early 2012.

The settlement must be ratified by the council at its next public meeting before it becomes official.

Sabeghi, who co-owned a brewpub in El Cerrito at the time of the attack, could not be reached for comment.

In July, the city agreed to pay $1.17 million to resolve 12 Occupy-related claims.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me