ShareThis Page
Nation

Johns' ex-aide admits thefts

| Thursday, Aug. 28, 2014, 12:01 a.m.

NEW YORK — Pleading guilty to a single charge, a former Jasper Johns assistant told a federal judge on Wednesday that he transported works of art stolen from the pop artist's Connecticut studio over state lines.

James Meyer, 52, of Salisbury, Conn., told U.S. District Judge J. Paul Oetken in New York that he removed 22 pieces from Johns' studio in Sharon without the artist's permission so that he could sell them at a gallery.

Meyer, Johns' studio assistant for more than 25 years, pleaded guilty to interstate transportation of stolen property, admitting moving the art works from 2006 to 2011.

The art was sold by a Manhattan gallery for $6.5 million. Meyer provided the owner with fictitious authentication papers, prosecutors said. Meyer got half the proceeds.

According to the government, Meyer boasted to the gallery owner and prospective buyers that Johns had given the works to him as gifts, but that was not true.

Prosecutors said Meyer required each purchaser to sign an agreement promising not to loan, exhibit or resell the art for at least eight years.

“James Meyer made millions by stealing and selling the valuable artworks that he was entrusted with maintaining,” U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said.

Prosecutors said Meyer's responsibilities included maintaining a studio file drawer containing pieces of art that were not yet completed by Johns and not authorized by Johns to be placed in the art market.

As part of Meyer's signed plea, he has agreed not to challenge any sentence between three and four years in prison or any forfeiture amount that is less than $3.9 million. Sentencing is scheduled for Dec. 10.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me