ShareThis Page
Nation

Wrongly convicted man freed after 28 years

| Wednesday, Oct. 15, 2014, 9:36 p.m.

NEW YORK — Nearly three decades into a prison sentence he began as a teenager, a New York man who had been championed by boxer Rubin “Hurricane” Carter walked free Wednesday because a judge vacated his murder conviction at a prosecutor's request.

David McCallum was 16 years old in 1986 when a jury in Brooklyn found him and Willie Stuckey Jr. guilty of kidnapping and murdering Nathan Blenner. McCallum, now 45, had been in a state prison since. Stuckey, whose conviction was quashed Wednesday, died in prison in 2001.

After reviewing their cases, Ken Thompson, who became Brooklyn's district attorney in January, asked Judge Matthew D'Emic to quash the convictions, saying both men's confessions were false and contradicted by evidence.

Sitting beside Stuckey's mother, McCallum began sobbing, resting his head on a table, as the judge told him he and Stuckey were exonerated. Minutes later, McCallum, who was denied parole for insisting he was innocent, walked free and embraced his mother.

“I'm very, very happy but very, very sad at the same time, because this situation in some ways could have been avoided,” McCallum, dressed in a khaki jacket and a pair of beaten black leather shoes, told reporters gathered at the State Supreme Court in Brooklyn.

He said he was not bitter but called the justice system “broken” and said he planned to speak out on the issue of wrongful convictions.

Rubin Carter, the former professional boxer who spent 19 years in prison on what was later ruled a wrongful murder conviction, became an advocate for McCallum, and before his death in April, said it was his final wish that McCallum be released.

Thompson said “not a single piece of evidence” linked the two men to the crime.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me