ShareThis Page
Nation

W.Va. bill proposes welfare drug tests

| Tuesday, Feb. 10, 2015, 8:33 p.m.

CHARLESTON — West Virginia Republican lawmakers are pushing to require some drug testing of welfare recipients, while tailoring efforts to be less all-encompassing than the program struck down as unconstitutional in Florida.

A Senate panel Tuesday cleared a bill to start a one-year, three-county drug-testing pilot program, without specifying which counties. The state ranks abysmally in many drug-abuse categories.

Beneficiaries of the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program would take the tests at their own expense of about $57 if officials had reasonable suspicion of illegal drug use. The money would be taken out of their first check and reimbursed if they passed.

Missed appointments at a local county office, personal demeanor, drug-related police records, denial of a job application or termination from a job because of illegal drug use, or other screening records indicating illegal drug use are among the criteria that could trigger a test. The Department of Health and Human Resources could determine other flags that would spur a screening.

If a parent fails a drug test, the Senate bill allows another person to receive welfare on behalf of that parent's child to avoid a lapse in aid.

At least 12 states have passed laws requiring drug testing for public assistance, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me