ShareThis Page
Nation

Senior British lord seen snorting powder in video quits post

| Sunday, July 26, 2015, 6:54 p.m.
FILE - This Tuesday, Dec. 16, 1997 file photo shows the deputy speaker of the Houe of Lords John Sewel. Sewel has resigned his position after publication of photos and a video allegedly showing him using cocaine with prostitutes. Lords Speaker Baroness D'Souza Sunday called John Sewel's alleged behavior 'shocking and unacceptable' and said she is calling in police to investigate on an urgent basis. The Sun on Sunday newspaper on Sunday, July 26, 2015 published photographs of him naked and appearing to snort cocaine along with snippets of his conversations with women said to be prostitutes. (Suzanne Hubbard/PA via AP, file)     UNITED KINGDOM OUT       -     NO SALES     -    NO ARCHIVES
FILE - This Tuesday, Dec. 16, 1997 file photo shows the deputy speaker of the Houe of Lords John Sewel. Sewel has resigned his position after publication of photos and a video allegedly showing him using cocaine with prostitutes. Lords Speaker Baroness D'Souza Sunday called John Sewel's alleged behavior 'shocking and unacceptable' and said she is calling in police to investigate on an urgent basis. The Sun on Sunday newspaper on Sunday, July 26, 2015 published photographs of him naked and appearing to snort cocaine along with snippets of his conversations with women said to be prostitutes. (Suzanne Hubbard/PA via AP, file) UNITED KINGDOM OUT - NO SALES - NO ARCHIVES

LONDON — A senior British lord quit his post Sunday and will undergo a police investigation as a result of a tabloid newspaper's release of a video showing him semi-naked and snorting white powder through a banknote while partying with two women.

John Buttifant Sewel stood down from his post as deputy speaker of Britain's unelected House of Lords when The Sun released the footage and accused him of using cocaine and of hiring prostitutes.

Sewel, 69, who is married, could not be immediately reached for comment. Baroness Frances D'Souza, the upper chamber's speaker, said Sewel had decided to resign as deputy speaker and would be investigated by police. She did not say if he confirmed or denied the allegations.

The imbroglio arises as Britain's politicians are still trying to regain voter trust eroded in a far-reaching 2009 expenses scandal and could fuel support for former fringe parties who have styled themselves as anti-establishment.

Ironically, Sewel's senior position in the House of Lords tasked him with ensuring fellow lords behaved properly. Packed with political appointees from all parties, the House of Lords is charged with scrutinizing government legislation, but some politicians on the left believe it is an elitist anachronism and should be abolished.

Sewel's behavior was “shocking and unacceptable,” D'Souza said in a statement.

“Lord Sewel has this morning resigned as chairman of committees. The House of Lords will continue to uphold standards in public life and will not tolerate departure from these standards,” she said.

“These serious allegations will be referred to the House of Lords commissioner for standards and the Metropolitan Police for investigation as a matter of urgency.”

The Sun said Sewel had disgraced himself and Parliament and said that Westminster, the seat of Parliament, sometimes seemed as if it were “a giant cesspit of moral, financial and sexual corruption.”

“His behavior reeks of the sense of entitlement so widespread in our political class,” it wrote.

“The Deputy Speaker of the House of Lords should be a figure of respect and unimpeachable character. Not a low-life.”

The scandal follows a press campaign aimed at John Bercow, the speaker of the House of Commons, over what his critics say are his excessive expenses.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me