ShareThis Page
World

Britain's Johnson refuses to apologize

| Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 7:57 p.m.
British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson takes part in a joint news conference with Secretary of State John Kerry on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, at the Foreign Office in London.
REUTERS
British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson takes part in a joint news conference with Secretary of State John Kerry on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, at the Foreign Office in London.

LONDON — British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson said Tuesday it would take far too long for him to apologize for the “rich thesaurus” of rude comments and insults he has directed at world leaders and others over the years.

Johnson, a former journalist with a talent for trenchant comments that his critics say sometimes tip over into untruth, said his utterances over a three-decade career had often been “misconstrued.”

Appointed foreign secretary, to widespread surprise, in a government reshuffle following Britain's vote to leave the European Union last month, Johnson first made his name in the early 1990s as a foreign correspondent in Brussels writing highly colored stories about the EU.

Since then, he has continued to court controversy, for example accusing President Obama of nurturing an ancestral dislike for the British empire. He also wrote an obscene limerick about President Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey.

In the run-up to the referendum, he fronted the campaign to leave the EU, lending support to claims on government spending and immigration that critics said were at best misleading.

Appearing at a London news conference with Secretary of State John Kerry, Johnson was asked if he was going to apologize for his disobliging remarks about world leaders.

“We can spend an awfully long time going over lots of stuff that I've written over the last 30 years ... all of which in my view has been taken out of context, but never mind, some serious issues call us today,” Johnson said.

He was then asked if he wanted to retract his comments about Obama, or whether they were an indication of the kind of diplomacy he intended to practice in his new job.

“I'm afraid that there is such a rich thesaurus now of things that I have said that have been one way or another, through what alchemy I do not know, somehow misconstrued that it would really take me too long to engage in a fully global itinerary of apology to all concerned,” Johnson responded.

He stuck to his guns, even when accused by another reporter of having a long history of exaggerations and “frankly outright lies.”

“Let me just repeat my point, which is that I think people are more than welcome to rake over stuff I've written over many, many years but I think (the) most important thing is to get on with the very heavy agenda we have before us today, and to try and sort out, if we can, some of the intensifying problems we are seeing particularly in Syria.”

Johnson on two occasions said that one of the issues he would be seeking to tackle was the burgeoning “crisis in Egypt.” It was not clear what he was talking about, but the foreign office said he had intended to say Egypt.

He did get a break from Kerry, who said the U.S. ambassador in Brussels had referred to Johnson as a “very smart and capable man.” Kerry added: “That's the Boris Johnson I intend to work with.”

“I can live with that,” said a rather sheepish-looking Johnson, prompting Kerry to reply: “It's called diplomacy, Boris.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me