ShareThis Page

Obama, Duterte exchange niceties

| Wednesday, Sept. 7, 2016, 8:42 p.m.

VIENTIANE, Laos — President Obama and controversial Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte bumped into each other while attending a dinner of world leaders here Wednesday, exchanging niceties after Obama canceled an earlier sit-down because of vulgar comments Duterte directed toward him in public.

The encounter “consisted of pleasantries” between the two before the gala dinner of the Association of South East Asian leaders meeting here this week, according to a White House official.

The description of a toned-down encounter diverted from their exchanges from afar earlier in the week.

Ahead of what would have been their first meeting, Duterte anticipated that Obama would press him on violent crackdowns on narcotics trafficking in the Philippines as well as charges of extrajudicial killings. Duterte declared in an interview that he would curse Obama if he dared to bring up the matters in their private encounter. “I will swear at you,” promised Duterte, whose history of crude remarks gained notice internationally after he was elected this year.

Obama said shortly afterward that he did plan to discuss his concerns about Duterte's record on human rights, a subject he almost always broaches with other world leaders. Obama then decided that in light of Duterte's comments, the two probably couldn't have a “productive” discussion during his final presidential trip to Asia and canceled the meeting.

The meeting with the leader of a key American ally in the region had been intended in part to remind the Chinese government that the United States has strong relationships in Southeast Asia, all part of Obama's strategy of providing a strong counterbalance to the rising Chinese power on the continent.

After Obama canceled the meeting, Duterte retreated, telling journalists that he regretted his words.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me