ShareThis Page
World

Ohio girl pleads 'true' to lesser charge in dad's slaying

| Monday, May 22, 2017, 5:51 p.m.

WARREN, Ohio — A 15-year-old girl charged in the fatal shooting of her sleeping father pleaded “true” to a reduced charge of involuntary manslaughter and was sentenced Monday to one year in jail.

The girl's attorney has said she shot her 41-year-old father last July to stop him from abusing the family.

The girl, who has been in jail since the shooting and had been charged as a juvenile with aggravated murder, will serve two more months in jail. Trumbull County Family Court Judge Pamela Rintala also ordered her to undergo mental health treatment.

Assistant county prosecutor Stanley Elkins said the plea deal came after witnesses who were at the scene of the shooting changed their testimony.

He said those who were in the house had told police the girl had not been abused.

The girl's attorney, Ian Friedman, said her father was abusive to her mom and that she and her siblings witnessed it every day.

He said the teen shot her father once in the head with his .45-caliber handgun as he slept on a living room couch at the family's home in Warren, roughly 50 miles southeast of Cleveland.

The Associated Press generally does not name juveniles accused of crimes.

Friedman described the father as controlling and said he required his wife to constantly remain near him.

The girl's 41-year-old mother told WJW-TV in Cleveland last year that she filed for a protective order against her husband five years ago but later dismissed it. The mother called her daughter a hero for her actions.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me