ShareThis Page
World

Conn. state police solve mystery of who defecated in cul-de-sac

| Wednesday, Feb. 14, 2018, 12:21 p.m.

HARTFORD, Conn. — A weeks-long investigation into who defecated three times in a cul-de-sac in East Granbury, Conn., is over.

Troopers have charged Holly E. Malone, 43, of Simsbury, with second-degree breach of peace. State police said Tuesday that Malone could not make it to her destination or a bathroom.

The investigation was spurred when the first selectman reached out to Trooper Sean Mahar to say that feces was found in the cul-de-sac on Nov. 6 of last year. They did some testing and determined it was, in fact, human excrement.

Toilet paper was also found at the scene.

Nine days passed, and troopers again found some feces in the roadway. So they set up a motion-activated camera to catch the culprit, they said.

On Dec. 5, state police said even more feces was found, so they downloaded the video from the camera and spotted the suspect's car.

Troopers spoke to Malone, who admitted to the incidents. She was taken into custody Tuesday during a routine traffic stop.

The incidents under investigation by troopers happened more than 3 miles from Malone's Simsbury home.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me