ShareThis Page
World

South Carolina man who installed ATMs charged with thefts

| Thursday, July 12, 2018, 9:36 a.m.
A South Carolina man who installed ATMs for a bank has been arrested and charged with taking almost $16,000 from the machines. (Flickr/Aaron Poffenberger)
A South Carolina man who installed ATMs for a bank has been arrested and charged with taking almost $16,000 from the machines. (Flickr/Aaron Poffenberger)

YORK, S.C. — A South Carolina man who installed ATMs for a bank has been arrested and charged with taking almost $16,000 from the machines.

State Law Enforcement Division spokesman Thom Berry said in a news release that 28-year-old John Edward Martin of York was arrested Tuesday after an investigation requested by Wells Fargo.

An arrest warrant says Martin is charged with grand larceny of more than $10,000. SLED says $15,900 was taken in York County branches from November to February.

Berry said the bank requested a SLED investigation after it noticed more than $17,000 was missing.

An affidavit says other thefts occurred in Spartanburg and Richland counties. SLED says the investigation is continuing.

Martin is being held in the York County jail. It was not known if he has a lawyer yet.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me