ShareThis Page
World

Mexico officials: Roof garden may have caused mall collapse

| Friday, July 13, 2018, 12:00 p.m.
The Artz Pedregal shopping mall stands partially collapsed on the south side of Mexico City, Thursday, July 12, 2018. The newly opened shopping mall partly collapsed after structural problems apparently led the mall’s operators to evacuate the area, and no injuries were reported.  (AP Photo/Anthony Vazquez)
The Artz Pedregal shopping mall stands partially collapsed on the south side of Mexico City, Thursday, July 12, 2018. The newly opened shopping mall partly collapsed after structural problems apparently led the mall’s operators to evacuate the area, and no injuries were reported. (AP Photo/Anthony Vazquez)

MEXICO CITY — A roof garden installed on top of a newly opened shopping mall on Mexico City’s south side may have caused part of the structure to collapse.

The Mexico City prosecutors’ office said late Thursday that planters used in the roof garden added excess weight that apparently contributed to the collapse of a cantilevered section that stuck out from the building.

The mall’s operators quickly evacuated the area Thursday after a support beam failed. About five minutes later, the top floors collapsed. No injuries were reported.

The city has promoted the installation of roof gardens, in part for their supposed environmental benefits.

The Artz Pedregal mall opened in March, though parts remain under construction. Built on the edge of the city’s main expressway, the mall had suffered previous subsoil slides.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me