ShareThis Page
World

Trump threatens to expand trade war to all Chinese imports entering the US

| Friday, Sept. 7, 2018, 10:18 p.m.

President Trump said Friday that he is ready to impose tariffs on $267 billion in Chinese goods, on top of the additional $200 billion that he said will likely be hit with import taxes in a matter of days.

If eventually carried out, Trump’s latest threat could result in tariffs on all Chinese goods entering the United States, an unprecedented escalation of his trade war with China.

The U.S. in July began imposing tariffs on $50 billion in Chinese industrial imports as Trump moved to confront Beijing over a range of policies that have long vexed American leaders.

“We’ve taxed them $50 billion — that’s on technology,” the president told reporters aboard Air Force One. “Now we’ve added another $200 billion. And I hate to say that, but behind that, there’s another $267 billion ready to go on short notice if I want. That totally changes the equation.”

Stocks dipped after Trump’s comments became public but recovered most of their losses. The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed down about 77 points or 0.3 percent in mid-afternoon trading.

The tariffs that Trump has imposed, and threatened to impose, total $517 billion — more than the $505 billion in Chinese goods that entered the country last year. The president says the tariffs are needed to force China to stop stealing U.S. technology and coercing American companies to surrender their trade secrets in return for access to the Chinese market.

It’s not clear why the president cited the specific figure he used. The White House did not reply to a request for comment.

So far this year, U.S. imports from China are running roughly 8 percent higher than during the same period in 2017. If that pace continued for the remainder of this year, Chinese imports would top $548 billion — leaving Trump a bit short of complete coverage of Chinese goods.

The office of the U.S. trade representative Thursday finished accepting comments on the next round of tariffs, which could hit up to $200 billion in Chinese products any day. Many products purchased by consumers, such as refrigerators, spark plugs and furniture, are among the potential targets.

Trump’s decision to double-down on his uncompromising stance toward China means little chance of an early resolution of the standoff between the world’s two largest economies. Additional U.S. tariffs are certain to trigger Chinese retaliation, though China’s smaller volume of American imports means that it can’t match Trump’s tariffs on a dollar-for-dollar basis. Chinese officials may respond by subjecting American companies operating in China to unexpected tax audits, custom inspections or even consumer boycotts.

“The end game in the U.S.-China trade war has now become even more difficult to discern as both sides step up their attacks and counter-attacks,” said Cornell University economist Eswar Prasad, former head of the International Monetary Fund’s China division. “Trump’s remarks confirm his intention to continue escalating trade sanctions until China capitulates, and China has equally clearly signaled it has no intention of doing so.”

Aboard Air Force One, the president cited the suffering Chinese stock market as an indication that the U.S. is winning the trade conflict. The Shanghai market is down roughly 23 percent in dollar terms so far this year while the Dow has risen nearly 5 percent.

“China is moving lower in their economy. The U.S. is moving higher,” Lawrence Kudlow, director of the National Economic Council, said on CNBC. “We’re the hottest place in the world.”

Despite several rounds of talks between U.S. and Chinese officials, the two countries have made little progress toward resolving their differences. Chinese diplomats complain that the Trump administration lacks a single negotiator empowered to make a deal and is vague about its objectives.

But Kudlow said the U.S. goals are clear. “Lower barriers, open markets, quit stealing IP and technology,” he said, using an abbreviation for intellectual property. “These things are not hard.”

As the president readies additional anti-China trade barriers, some economists worry about the economic toll. An intensified trade war would likely hurt the U.S. more than China, according to S&P Global Ratings. By 2021, based on IMF economic forecasts, the U.S. would lose about 1 percent of its annual output or about $230 billion while China would lose 0.6 percent of its $18 trillion economy that year or $110 billion.

“The direct economic effects of the U.S.-Chain tariff dispute have so far been limited. That may be about to change,” wrote S&P economist Satyam Panday.

Some business groups greeted the president’s latest tariff threats with dismay. “The notion that the president is going to add an extra $267 billion worth of tariffs is grossly irresponsible and possibly illegal,” said Jose Castaneda, spokesman for the Information Technology Industry Council, which argues that the tariffs are not permitted under U.S. trade law.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me