ShareThis Page
World

Manhattan DA drops part of Harvey Weinstein case

| Thursday, Oct. 11, 2018, 10:42 a.m.
Harvey Weinstein arrives to court in New York, Thursday, Oct. 11, 2018. Weinstein is set to appear before a judge as his lawyers try to get the charges dismissed in his criminal case. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig)
Harvey Weinstein arrives to court in New York, Thursday, Oct. 11, 2018. Weinstein is set to appear before a judge as his lawyers try to get the charges dismissed in his criminal case. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig)
Harvey Weinstein enters State Supreme Court, Thursday, Oct. 11, 2018, in New York. Judge James Burke is expected to issue rulings Thursday on defense motions seeking to dismiss some or all of a six-count indictment accusing Weinstein of rape and sexual assault. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)
Harvey Weinstein enters State Supreme Court, Thursday, Oct. 11, 2018, in New York. Judge James Burke is expected to issue rulings Thursday on defense motions seeking to dismiss some or all of a six-count indictment accusing Weinstein of rape and sexual assault. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)
Harvey Weinstein, left, arrives to court in New York, Thursday, Oct. 11, 2018. Weinstein is set to appear before a judge as his lawyers try to get the charges dismissed in his criminal case. AP Photo/Seth Wenig)
Harvey Weinstein, left, arrives to court in New York, Thursday, Oct. 11, 2018. Weinstein is set to appear before a judge as his lawyers try to get the charges dismissed in his criminal case. AP Photo/Seth Wenig)
Harvey Weinstein, center, arrives to court in New York, Thursday, Oct. 11, 2018. Weinstein is set to appear before a judge as his lawyers try to get the charges dismissed in his criminal case.(AP Photo/Seth Wenig)
Harvey Weinstein, center, arrives to court in New York, Thursday, Oct. 11, 2018. Weinstein is set to appear before a judge as his lawyers try to get the charges dismissed in his criminal case.(AP Photo/Seth Wenig)
Harvey Weinstein arrives to court in New York, Thursday, Oct. 11, 2018. Weinstein is set to appear before a judge as his lawyers try to get the charges dismissed in his criminal case.(AP Photo/Seth Wenig)
Harvey Weinstein arrives to court in New York, Thursday, Oct. 11, 2018. Weinstein is set to appear before a judge as his lawyers try to get the charges dismissed in his criminal case.(AP Photo/Seth Wenig)
Harvey Weinstein, center, enters State Supreme Court, Thursday, Oct. 11, 2018 in New York. Judge James Burke is expected to issue rulings Thursday on defense motions seeking to dismiss some or all of a six-count indictment accusing Weinstein of rape and sexual assault. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)
Harvey Weinstein, center, enters State Supreme Court, Thursday, Oct. 11, 2018 in New York. Judge James Burke is expected to issue rulings Thursday on defense motions seeking to dismiss some or all of a six-count indictment accusing Weinstein of rape and sexual assault. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)

NEW YORK — Manhattan’s district attorney dropped part of the criminal sexual assault case against Harvey Weinstein on Thursday after evidence emerged that cast doubt on the account one of his three accusers provided to the grand jury.

The development was announced in court Thursday with Weinstein looking on.

The tossed charge involves allegations made by one of the three accusers in the case, Lucia Evans, who was among the first women to publicly accuse Weinstein of sexual assault.

In an expose published in The New Yorker one year ago Wednesday, Evans accused Weinstein of forcing her to perform oral sex when they met alone in his office in 2004 to discuss her fledgling acting career. At the time, Evans was a 21-year-old college student.

Assistant District Attorney Joan Illuzzi-Orbon told the judge that prosecutors wouldn’t oppose dismissal of the count in the case involving Evans. She insisted the rest of the case, involving two other accusers, was strong.

“In short, your honor, we are moving full steam ahead,” she said.

Weinstein’s lawyer, Benjamin Brafman, told the judge he believed Evans had lied both to the grand jury and to The New Yorker about her encounter with Weinstein. He also said he believed a police detective had corruptly attempted to influence the case by keeping a witness from testifying about her misstatements.

“The integrity of these proceedings has been compromised,” he said. Outside court, he suggested that Evans should be prosecuted criminally for perjury.

Details of the potential problems with Evans’ testimony were not discussed in court, but were expected to be included in court filings set to be unsealed later in the day.

Weinstein’s lawyers and prosecutors had been wrangling over the part of the indictment pertaining to Evans’ allegations over the last few weeks in closed-door meetings and sealed court papers.

Brafman said that inconsistencies in Evans’ account were initially discovered by a fact checker at The New Yorker.

In a statement, a lawyer for Evans said she was disappointed by the DA’s decision to “abandon” her.

“Let me be clear: the decision to throw away my client’s sexual assault charges says nothing about Weinstein’s guilt or innocence. Nor does it reflect on Lucia’s consistent allegation that she was sexually assaulted with force by Harvey Weinstein,” said attorney Carrie Goldberg. “It only speaks volumes about the Manhattan DA’s office and its mishandling of my client’s case.”

Weinstein, who has denied all allegations of non-consensual sex, still faces charges over allegations that he raped an unidentified woman in his hotel room in 2013 and performed a forcible sex act on a different woman in 2006.

He has pleaded not guilty and is free on $1 million bail.

Images of Weinstein in handcuffs were seen by many women as a cathartic moment in the #MeToo reckoning. The collapse of part of the case against him could mean trouble for the prosecutor.

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance Jr. has already been fiercely criticized for declining to prosecute Weinstein when an Italian model accused him of grabbing her breasts in 2015. At the time, Vance cited a lack of supporting evidence, despite the existence of a clandestinely made recording of Weinstein discussing the episode with the woman.

In the months after The New York Times and The New Yorker began publishing stories about Weinstein’s interactions with women, activists pressured Vance to bring charges as dozens of people came forward with claims of sexual misconduct against him.

New York Police officials poured on the pressure, too, saying publicly that they believed they had gathered ample evidence to make an arrest.

The Associated Press does not identify alleged victims of sexual assaults unless they come forward publicly, as Evans has done.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me