ShareThis Page

Trump says changes coming in U.S. handling of high-tech visas

| Friday, Jan. 11, 2019, 8:12 p.m.
President Donald Trump walks on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington on Thursday, Jan. 10, 2019, after returning from a trip to the southern border. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
President Donald Trump walks on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington on Thursday, Jan. 10, 2019, after returning from a trip to the southern border. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

WASHINGTON — President Trump on Friday promised changes in the way the United States handles temporary visas that allow American companies to bring high-tech and other skilled workers into the country

In a tweet, Trump said those who hold the temporary H1-B visas can “rest assured” because changes were coming that will bring “both simplicity and certainty to your stay, including a potential path to citizenship.”

The president’s comments came amid a bitter Washington fight over funding for his border wall that has forced a partial government shutdown. Furloughed federal workers missed their first paycheck Friday.

Trump traveled to the border this week to make his case for a wall, and he appeared with the families of people killed by immigrants in the United States illegally. He also gave a prime-time address from the Oval Office in which he spoke of how immigrants in the country illegally were responsible for some brutal crimes.

On Friday, he said the United States wants to encourage talented and highly skilled people to pursue careers in the nation.

The changes to which he was referring are likely a proposal announced late last year by the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees immigration.

The proposal included a shift to online applications for the coveted visas and changed procedures to increase the advantages of applicants with graduate degrees.

It’s a lottery system. There are 65,000 visas available, plus an additional 20,000 for those with advanced degrees from a U.S. institution. The advanced-degree visas are chosen first, and those not selected are thrown into the pot of the 65,000 visas, which include those with bachelor’s degrees.

Immigration officials proposed flipping it so that the 65,000 visas are parceled out first to ensure as many people with advanced degrees as possible were allowed in.

The proposed changes were subject to a public comment period that’s now closed. Homeland Security officials will consider the comments and then publish the final rules.

“These proposed regulatory changes would help ensure more of the best and brightest workers from around the world come to America,” said Michael J. Bars, spokesman for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

The American Immigration Lawyers Association cautioned against using an advanced degree as a sole method of determining the value of a worker, saying it could hurt some industries.

“The healthcare sector, moreover, which relies heavily on foreign physicians to supplement a shortage of U.S. doctors, will also be disadvantaged, as many such physicians complete their medical education overseas before seeking employment in the United States,” it said.

During his campaign, Trump gave conflicting statements about visas for high-skilled immigrants. At some points, he maligned current programs, saying they took jobs from Americans. At others, he stressed the need for more high-skilled workers and bemoaned the fact that foreigners who attend Ivy League colleges can’t stay in the United States and create jobs.

He ordered a review of the visa program. The tech industry insists the program is vital. Proponents say it encourages students to stay in the United States after getting their degrees in high-tech specialties.

The Obama administration raised concerns that some businesses were using the visas to favor foreigners over U.S. workers, suing companies that it said violated the Immigration and Nationality Act’s anti-discrimination provisions.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me