ShareThis Page
World

Crossbow attacks on dogs sweep through Managua, Nicaragua

| Friday, April 11, 2014, 6:21 p.m.

MANAGUA, Nicaragua — Renato Franco Penalba awoke one morning to find his pet dog Cookie in agony, skewered by an arrow on his patio.

He raced her to a veterinarian, but the basset hound-Pekingese mix did not survive.

“I had never seen an animal in so much pain,” veterinarian Enrique Rimbaud said Friday.

It quickly turned out that Cookie was not alone.

When Franco Penalba posted an account of the killing on a social networking site, he began to hear of other cases.

Rimbaud, who is president of the animal protection group Amarte Foundation, said at least seven dogs have been attacked with crossbow bolts in the same upscale district of Nicaragua's capital.

In an impoverished Central American country where strays have long led miserable lives in the streets, the killings of at least seven cherished house dogs have caused an uproar on social media and in the press. Police are investigating and say they fear that people, too, one day could be targeted.

“Our dog was 9 years old. She wasn't the kind of dog who roamed the streets,” said Franco Penalba, a 30-year-old business consultant.

Rimbaud said he struggled for hours to save the dog, giving her repeated injections of anesthetics before she died.

“These weapons are very powerful,” Rimbaud said. “They do a great amount of damage to muscles, bones, arteries and veins.”

Even police dogs had suffered the same kind of attack.

“There is a guard post in front of my house, and their dog was killed with an arrow, too,” Wilbur Arteaga said.

Whoever is killing the dogs apparently uses a relatively costly imported crossbow, something few Nicaraguans can afford, and fires custom carbon arrows that police say are not sold in Nicaragua.

“It is someone with money,” Franco Penalba said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me