ShareThis Page

Sobbing Pistorius cleared of murder of girlfriend

| Thursday, Sept. 11, 2014, 8:15 p.m.

JOHANNESBURG — A judge ruled on Thursday that South African athlete Oscar Pistorius was not guilty of premeditated murder in the shooting death of his girlfriend. But the judge found him “negligent,” raising the prospect of a manslaughter conviction.

Judge Thokozile Masipa read a lengthy explanation of the evidence and charges, then recessed the court until Friday without rendering a final verdict.

She told the court that she found Pistorius “acted too hastily and used excessive force” when he fired four times into the door of a toilet stall in his apartment, killing Reeva Steenkamp, 29.

“It is clear that his conduct was negligent,” she said.

The Olympic and Paralympic athlete, known as the Blade Runner for his use of specially designed prosthetic legs, was on trial for the shooting death of Steenkamp on Valentine's Day in 2013.

Prosecutors accused Pistorius of intentionally killing her by firing through the door of the stall where, they alleged, she had taken refuge from an argument.

Pistorius claimed he thought Steenkamp was in bed and that he accidentally shot her through the bathroom door, mistakenly believing there was an intruder in his home.

The judge had said state prosecutors failed to prove that Pistorius, 27, is guilty of either premeditated murder or second-degree murder, thus ruling out those charges.

Seated in the dock, Pistorius frequently sobbed and held his head in his hands as the judge ruled on the most serious charges.

There was a lunch break, then the judge criticized Pistorius for his conduct on the night of the killing.

A reasonable person, she said, “would have foreseen if he fired shots at the door, the person inside the toilet might be struck and die as a result.”

If he had felt threatened by an intruder, the judge said, “all the accused had to do was to pick up his cellphone to call security or the police. He could have run to the balcony and screamed in the same way he had screamed after the incident.”

Pistorius, she said, “had reasonable time to reflect, to think and to conduct himself reasonably.”

The defendant faces a verdict on two charges relating to the discharge of a firearm in a public place and one charge of illegal possession of ammunition. Masipa, not a jury, decided the verdict in line with South African legal custom.

If Pistorius had been found guilty of premeditated murder, he could have received 25 years in prison. A conviction of culpable homicide, the term for manslaughter in South Africa, carries a maximum 15-year prison sentence.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me