ShareThis Page

Saudi King Salman's closer Turkey, Qatar ties pressure Egypt

| Monday, March 9, 2015, 8:12 p.m.

CAIRO — Under its new monarch, Saudi Arabia appears to be moving to improve relations with Turkey and Qatar and soften its stance against the Muslim Brotherhood with the aim of weakening Iran. The shift could lead to pressure on its ally Egypt to reconcile with them as well.

The pressure, however, threatens to open frictions within the alliance between Egypt and Saudi Arabia, two of the Middle East's strongest Sunni countries. Under the late Saudi King Abdullah, who died in January, the two nations increased their cooperation against terrorists, the Brotherhood and the influence of Shiite Iran in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Yemen.

Egyptian President Abdel-Fatah al-Sisi has appeared to resist any reconciliation with Turkey and Qatar, the two top regional backers of Sisi's No. 1 nemesis, the Muslim Brotherhood. Sisi rose to the presidency after, as army chief, he led the military's 2013 ouster of Mohamed Morsy, a Brotherhood leader elected Egypt's president a year earlier.

Since the ouster, Sisi has led a fierce crackdown on Islamists, crushing the Brotherhood and branding it a terrorist organization, while Egyptian media have depicted Turkey and Qatar as trying to destabilize Egypt by backing the group.

The new Saudi king, Salman, who rose to throne when his half brother Abdullah died Jan. 23, appears to view the greater threat as Iran or terrorist groups such as al-Qaida and the Islamic State. Turkey and Qatar could give a boost to a front against those opponents.

As part of their growing alliance, Saudi Arabia and other Persian Gulf nations have given Egypt billions of dollars to prop up its crippled economy.

Still, there have been divergences between Egypt and Saudi Arabia — particularly over Syria. Saudi Arabia seeks the removal of Iranian-backed Syrian President Bashar Assad.

Sisi, meanwhile, consistently has avoided saying whether Egypt objects to Assad's remaining in power.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me