ShareThis Page
World

With British election near, surveys give Conservatives wide lead as more trusted to run economy

| Saturday, April 4, 2015, 9:50 p.m.
Prime Minister and Conservative leader David Cameron won power in 2010 on the strength of a platform focused on fiscal austerity measures.
Getty Images
Prime Minister and Conservative leader David Cameron won power in 2010 on the strength of a platform focused on fiscal austerity measures.

LONDON — After enduring five years of some of the deepest spending cuts in Britain's modern history — with budgets for police, the arts and early-childhood development slashed — voters have the chance to ease the pain as the economy recovers.

But rather than pull back on austerity, the famously ascetic British appear ready to double down.

Although polls show that the Conservative Party — one of the two partners in the governing coalition — and its main opposition, Labor, remain locked in a dead heat with just over a month to go before the next general election, surveys give the Conservatives a wide lead on the question of who is trusted to run the economy.

And the Conservatives, led by Prime Minister David Cameron, have made no secret that their economic agenda for a second term looks much the same as the first. They plan to plunge the knife even deeper in areas where defenders say the cuts long ago stopped stripping away fat and began to strike bone.

The public's willingness to go along with at least several more years of austerity, even as Britain's overall economic picture brightens, reflects just how heavily the hangover of the global financial crisis continues to be felt in this country. Nearly eight years after the descent began, voters remain scarred by the prospect of a national treasury bled dry by rampant government spending.

“The general economic approach of ‘We need to bring down spending' is something that voters of all colors have bought into,” said Joe Twyman, head of political and social research at the polling firm YouGov. “There's a recognition that we just spent too much money.”

The antidote, first pitched by Cameron during his winning 2010 campaign, was to dramatically scale back. Governments across Europe did the same as German-style fiscal rectitude came to be seen as a cure-all for a boom-years binge.

After years of severe cuts, countries in southern Europe appear to be rejecting the medicine, with a radical leftist party winning election in Greece in January on a platform of ending austerity and another vying to do the same in Spain in a vote due this year.

But in Britain, where the cuts have been deep by national historical standards but relatively mild compared with southern Europe's, there is no sign of a widespread backlash.

Even the Labor Party, which has branded Cameron's plans for additional cuts “extreme,” has said it will not reverse austerity measures already enacted and in fact will continue to trim — just not as aggressively as the Conservatives.

“Labor doesn't want to give the Conservatives a stick with which to beat them,” Twyman said. “In Britain, we just don't have an effective, popular anti-austerity party.”

That's despite the fact that many economists question the wisdom of continuing to cut rather than borrow at a time when interest rates remain exceptionally low and the recovery is still fragile.

In a survey of leading British economists conducted last month by the Center for Macroeconomics, a substantial majority said the government's austerity-focused policies have hurt the recovery rather than helped.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me