ShareThis Page

Kuwait mosque bomber slipped security watch in Saudi Arabia, Bahrain

| Monday, June 29, 2015, 6:36 p.m.

The Saudi man who blew himself up in a Shiite mosque in Kuwait managed to slip out of his home country without raising any red flags and board a commercial flight transiting nearby Bahrain less than 24 hours before the deadly attack.

The details of the bomber's final hours, released by regional authorities, highlight the growing involvement of undetected Islamic State sympathizers on the Arabian peninsula and the threat they pose to countries closer to home than the battlefields of Iraq and Syria.

The blast Friday in one of Kuwait City's most prominent Shiite mosques killed 27 worshippers and wounded more than 200. It followed two suicide bombings in neighboring Saudi Arabia weeks earlier, raising fears of more attacks to come in the Persian Gulf.

Kuwaiti officials have identified the bomber as Fahad Suleiman Abdulmohsen al-Gabbaa, a Saudi man in his early 20s who landed in the country just hours before the attack.

The bombing — which struck on the same day as deadly attacks in Tunisia and France — has rattled Kuwait. Violence is rare in the small and stable OPEC nation, which is ruled by a Sunni monarchy and has a sizable Shiite minority. Kuwait regularly hosts American soldiers and other Western troops.

It is unclear how much help al-Gabbaa had inside Kuwait and when and how he obtained his explosives. Kuwaiti police have arrested at least two people in connection with the attack.

One is a man who authorities allege drove al-Gabbaa to the mosque. Another, according to the Kuwaiti Interior Ministry, is a known follower of “fundamentalist and deviant ideology” who housed the driver.

Residents can travel easily in the six-nation Gulf Cooperation Council bloc, making it simple for al-Gabbaa to exploit the region's extensive transportation links.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me