ShareThis Page

Egypt imposes strict anti-terror law

| Monday, Aug. 17, 2015, 7:51 p.m.

CAIRO — In a significant leap toward harsher authoritarian rule, Egypt has enacted a draconian anti-terrorism law that sets a broad definition for who and what could get a harsh set of punishments, including journalists who don't toe the government line.

The law adds provisions to protect security forces from prosecution, establishes stiffer prison sentences for terror-related offences, as well as heavy fines for those who publish “false news” and a special judicial circuit for terrorism cases.

Authorities claim the measures will halt attacks by Islamic terrorists and stop the spread of their ideology, but the restrictions have prompted concern from lawyers, rights groups, the opposition and Egyptian politicians and senior judges.

The 54-article bill, signed into law late Sunday by President Abdel-Fattah al-Sisi, establishes an extremely broad definition of terrorism, describing it in one article as any act that disturbs public order with force. Charges, such as organizing a terrorist group, carry the death penalty.

Egyptians lived under so-called “emergency laws” for decades that gave police extensive powers, encouraging a culture of brutality among security forces, something that partially inspired the 2011 uprising against longtime autocrat Hosni Mubarak.

Constitutional law expert Nour Farahat, who helped set up guidelines for the first post-Mubarak constitutional amendments, said the government ignored advice concerning the new law's constitutional flaws.

“This is because the Interior Ministry wants that, and the Interior Ministry is now ruling Egypt,” he wrote.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me