ShareThis Page

Taiwan election nears, reviving tensions with China

| Saturday, Sept. 19, 2015, 7:48 p.m.

TAIPEI, Taiwan — The Presidential Office Building in Taipei isn't easily mistaken for other buildings; it's an ornate Baroque-style structure that dates back to 1919 and is capped by a 200-foot-tall tower.

In July, China held a military exercise that included an assault on a building that, based on video from the mainland, closely resembled the presidential offices in Taipei.

The anxiety thermostat in Taiwan spiked. Many saw it as evidence that a real military invasion of their island could be in the works.

“There was a building that looked exactly like our president's office,” Hsia Li-yan, minister of Taiwan's Mainland Affairs Council, said in a recent interview. “What else could I think?”

Relations between Taiwan and China are less volatile than they were a decade ago, and strong economic ties serve as a hedge against hostilities. Yet the status quo could be shaken as soon as January, when Taiwan voters elect a new president.

Recent polls indicate a possible landslide victory for Tsai Ing-wen, who heads the Democratic Progressive Party and is far less friendly to Beijing than Taiwan's president, Ma Ying-jeou of the Chinese Nationalist Party.

On the mainland, China's leaders have made clear that they would treat Tsai's election as an affront. “All things we have achieved now could collapse,” Zhang Zhijun, director of China's Taiwan Affairs Office, said this year.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me