ShareThis Page
World

Swiss fighter's ID check on Russia jet raises tensions

| Monday, Oct. 19, 2015, 7:30 p.m.

Switzerland's military said one of its fighter jets performed a routine identification check on a Russian plane in Swiss air space on Monday, prompting Moscow to complain the aircrafts came “dangerously” close to each other.

Russia initially summoned the French ambassador in Moscow to protest, alleging a French military jet had come into “dangerous proximity” with the Tupolev, whose passengers included the speaker of its lower house en route to Geneva.

Moscow, which had threatened not to use France as a venue for international meetings in retaliation, later apologized for the mistake.

A Swiss Department of Defense spokesman confirmed the fighter was a Swiss F/A 18 jet that had been sent to verify the identity of the Russian plane with diplomatic clearance. Spokesman Peter Minder said the Swiss jet flew close enough to make visual contact with the Russian pilot, but there was no danger of a collision.

“It's standard procedure,” Minder said, adding the Swiss military performs such “live missions ... a hundred times a year” to confirm that aircraft entering Switzerland's air space have appropriate clearance.

“It's just a matter of identification,” he said.

Contact with the Russian pilot was made and the plane's identity was confirmed, Minder said, at which point the Swiss fighter returned to its base. The Russian plane landed in Geneva as planned.

France was quick to deny involvement.

The Russian speaker, Sergei Naryshkin, an ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, was heading to Geneva for an international meeting of parliamentarians.

Geneva's airport is very close to Switzerland's border with France, which may have led to confusion about whose airspace Naryshkin's aircraft was in and the jet's nationality.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me