ShareThis Page

Iran official urges opposition to new U.S. visa rules

| Monday, Dec. 28, 2015, 12:01 a.m.

TEHRAN — A top Iranian parliamentary official has written to his counterparts in Europe, China and Russia, calling on them to oppose “discriminatory” new U.S. visa regulations.

A bill passed by Congress this month bars citizens from 38 mainly European countries from traveling to the United States without a visa if they have visited Iran, Iraq, Syria or Sudan since 2011.

It requires a visa for citizens of those countries if they are dual nationals of any of the target nations.

The new regulations fly in the face of its landmark nuclear deal struck with major powers, including the United States, in July, Tehran said.

In the letter to his counterparts in the European parliament, France, Britain, Germany, Russia and China, the chairman of the Iranian parliament's national security and foreign policy committee, Alaedin Boroujerdi, described the law as “unfair and discriminatory.”

“I would like to urge you to make every effort to oppose this decision by the U.S. administration,” he said, quoted by the ISNA news agency, describing it as a “destructive blow” to the nuclear agreement.

The president of the French Senate, Gerard Larcher, criticized the new U.S. rules in a visit to Tehran last week, saying they send the “wrong signal” and undermine efforts to build confidence with Iran.

The move reflects calls by U.S. lawmakers and authorities to reduce security vulnerabilities after the deadly strikes last month in Paris, where some of the attackers were French and Belgians who could have traveled unrestricted to the United States.

Those affected will not be barred from the United States, but will be required to obtain a visa through standard means, which includes a face-to-face interview at a U.S. consulate.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me