ShareThis Page

Sheriff: We were ready to clear park

| Friday, Feb. 10, 2012, 12:00 p.m.

Allegheny County Sheriff William Mullen said on Thursday that he was prepared to evict Occupy Pittsburgh protesters had they remained in Bank of New York Mellon Corp.'s Downtown park.

Instead, about 60 deputies surrounded and searched a dark, empty Mellon Green with bomb-sniffing dogs about 5:15 a.m. yesterday, nearly 12 hours after the group protesting corporate greed departed for good after about a four-month encampment.

Mullen said deputies searched the park after someone made an online threat earlier in the week hinting that an explosive device would be left in the park. They found little but garbage and rats.

After the search, crews hired by BNY Mellon removed tents, picked up whatever was left and enclosed the mud-caked park in fencing.

"The park is closed, and we will begin planning for the extensive repairs," BNY Mellon spokesman Ron Gruendl said.

In court documents, Common Pleas Judge Christine A. Ward wrote that the banking giant could spend $70,000 to $100,000 to restore the park.

Protesters had hailed Mullen, insisting that he was standing up against BNY Mellon and not acting on the eviction notice, but Mullen said that wasn't the case.

He said that law enforcement knew protesters were monitoring any possible eviction movements, but also that protesters were "wearing down."

"I think this may be the first city in the country that they just left peacefully without interaction with the police," Mullen said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me