ShareThis Page

Upper St. Clair High School students win aerospace honors

| Thursday, May 5, 2011, 12:00 p.m.

The Ouroboros team from Upper St. Clair High School won the title of Pete Conrad Scholars in Aerospace on Sunday at the Conrad Foundation's 2011 Innovation Summit in Silicon Valley.

The Ouroboros team won for their development and design of the Perpetual Harvest Space Nutrition System that takes organic waste created during long-duration space flight and creates compost that is then used to grow fresh foods. It also serves as an air filter for human habitation.

In addition to a $5,000 Next Step Grant to continue their product development, along with a one-year membership in the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, team members also receive a one-year membership to the Scientific Research Society , and team coaches are awarded a $500 stipend via the AIAA Coaches Award.

The members of Team Ouroboros are Matthew Vernacchia, Brent Heard, Avisha Shah, Catherine Groschner and Yudi Chen.

"This national recognition for our students highlights their academic excellence, innovation and incredible work ethic. Their coach, Patricia Palazzolo, does a phenomenal job of providing life-changing experiences for her students," Dr. Sharon Suritsky, acting assistant to the superintendent for curriculum and instruction/supervisor of special education, said in a prepared statement.

The annual program encourages high school students from across the country to solve the challenges of the 21st century by creating breakthrough technologies using science, technology, engineering and math knowledge and skills.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me